ERA One

ERA One vs Trend Micro (Vision One + Apex One)

Comparison of the full ERA One portfolio with the Trend Micro ecosystem. Focus on what the customer can deploy in their own perimeter — and our hybrid answer.

Feature / layerTrend Micro (Vision One + Apex One)ERA One (full portfolio)
Delivery modelCloud-first SaaS (data lake in TM cloud)On-prem / air-gap + Sovereign Hybrid
Hybrid modelCloud required for full capabilityData stays home, updates/ops from ERA cloud
Protection updatesContinuously from cloudFrom ERA cloud (hybrid) or offline package (air-gap)
Managed / MSSPVision One MDR (cloud)ERA Managed View — partner console without raw-data access
Endpoint XDRApex One + Vision One correlationERA Core + Workbench
AI investigationTrendAI Companion (cloud)ERA Control AI — LLM in the perimeter
SOAR / responseLimited, MDR as a serviceERA Response built in
VM / exposureCREM/ASRM (cloud analytics)ERA Vuln + ERA Exposure
Servers / virtual patchDeep Security, strong lineupERA Manage + Virtual Patching
Email / cloud CNAPPStrong native modulesCollectors / logs, not full gateway
NDR / networkDeep DiscoveryERA Observe + NDR
SandboxDDANIntegration, no native sandbox
National IoC exchangeGlobal threat cloudERA National STIX/TAXII in the perimeter
UEM / ITSM / PAMSeparate productsManage + Service + PAM on one platform
Third-party EDRIntegration (SentinelOne, etc.)ERA BYO-EDR Hub
Summary: ERA One wins on sovereign on-prem / air-gap, a single agent for SecOps+IT-Ops, and built-in SOAR/AI without the cloud. With the Sovereign Hybrid model we also address the operational argument used by competitors: data and investigations stay with the customer, while protection updates, licenses, and support are delivered from the ERA cloud — without exporting raw telemetry or PII. Trend Micro (Vision One + Apex One) is stronger in maturity of individual niches and its global ecosystem; ERA is a local alternative to a subscription “zoo” with modern operations.
Head OfficeGeneva, Switzerland
Engineering CenterWarsaw, Poland
ERA One